(no subject)
Feb. 9th, 2006 09:00 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Because on the whole I've been entirely too serious lately:

take the WHAT BAD BOOK ARE YOU test.
and go to mewing.net. not as good as reading a good book, but way better than a bad one.
I haven't actually read this one, so I have no informed opinion on how bad it might or might not be.

take the WHAT BAD BOOK ARE YOU test.
and go to mewing.net. not as good as reading a good book, but way better than a bad one.
I haven't actually read this one, so I have no informed opinion on how bad it might or might not be.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-09 02:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-09 02:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-09 11:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-10 02:32 am (UTC)(BTW, I think this month's issue of Vanity Fair might interest you. I believe it hit the newsstands today.)
no subject
Date: 2006-02-10 03:26 am (UTC)To be fair I only read it at the urging of someone who thought it brilliant, so there is a range of opinion. Since then I've met 2 other people who've read it, one who agrees with me, and her friend, who loved it. So not much consensus there.
He is said to be a good writer, and I can see where he might be. If you're tempted I'd definitely try one of his other, much shorter, works. I may read one myself someday, if I can get the bad taste of tIJ out of my mouth.
If you want an experimental novel, I'd definitely read House of Leaves instead. It's very unsettling and very... unresolved. At first I wanted a neat ending with questions answered, which it very much does not have, but after a while I was ok with the lingering mystery. And even if you don't like it, it's much shorter than tIJ!
> (BTW, I think this month's issue of Vanity Fair might interest you. I believe it hit the newsstands today.)
Ok, I'll check it out.