(no subject)
Sep. 3rd, 2005 11:34 pmI am not claiming to be remotely surprised that it's happening, but I am a little surprised to see it put so bluntly; did the press suddenly rediscover their collective spine?
[Edit, 11:35 PM: Perhaps not; I notice the headline's already changed.]
[Edited again, 11:53 PM: It's changed at least for me, the headline I see is "Relief Approaches Convention Center" although the original still seems to be showing up for other people.]

[Edit, 11:35 PM: Perhaps not; I notice the headline's already changed.]
[Edited again, 11:53 PM: It's changed at least for me, the headline I see is "Relief Approaches Convention Center" although the original still seems to be showing up for other people.]

no subject
Date: 2005-09-04 03:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-04 03:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-04 03:53 am (UTC)the time stamp on the site says 41 past. It's now 53 past, and it's still showing that for me.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-04 03:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-04 04:10 am (UTC)white house shifts blame
Date: 2005-09-04 03:41 am (UTC)what's really surprised me, on the other hand, is geraldo and shepard freaking out in hannity's face on fauxnews. i mean, i can't stand geraldo, and i never watch fauxnews, but i've seen the clip. wow.
Re: white house shifts blame
Date: 2005-09-04 07:10 am (UTC)though that's wapo who doesn't suck too badly in general.
Yeah, if I'd seen that as the lead at the Washington Times' website, I'd have to go look outside for the rain of frogs.
I suppose a girl can dream though.
geraldo and shepard freaking out in hannity's face on fauxnews
Oh yeah, I saw that too; a bit of jaw-dropping took place, especially with the bitchslap about "this is perspective". Between that clip and watching Anderson Cooper ripping into Trent Lott and Mary Landrieu on camera, it's been an interesting couple of days.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-04 03:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-04 04:41 am (UTC)I mean, this claim (http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/09/03/katrina.chertoff/index.html) is so easily shown to be wrong (http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=13051).