geekchick: (relationships)
[personal profile] geekchick
Here's a poly-related question that's come up more than once now, and I thought I'd check to see other people's thoughts on the matter.

Say your partner is getting involved with someone new. What level of contact and outreach do you expect from this new person up front?  Do you expect them to, for example, send you an email to say hello and to explain that they don't want to steal your partner from you? Do you expect them to make a concentrated effort to be actively friendly towards you and assume some sort of hostility if they don't, or do you assume things are fine unless there's some indication otherwise?  For that matter, do you even consider your partner's relationship with them to be any of your business?  (Assuming that your partner in question is not a spouse or primary-level partner.)   How do you handle it when one person in a relationship web has got wildly different ideas (in either direction) on how much contact is required for comfort than the other people involved? [Edit: I seem to have been unclear on this last bit, based on some of the answers. When I say "how much contact is required", in this context I mean in the initial getting involved stage; say Partner A really wants Potential Partner B to check in with them while B is initially getting involved with their common partner or else they'll assume Partner B is hostile, while it may not occur to Partner B that there's any reason to check in in the first place. All of this is in the context of making initial relationship-noises.]

Usually my take on it is that while outreach is not unwelcome, it's far from required.   If the only obvious thing that we have in common is that we share (or potentially share)  a partner, I don't necessarily feel like I need to try to force some sort of friendship there.  I assume things are neutral to okay unless I hear otherwise, and I honestly don't understand the mindset of assuming hostility from the outset.

Date: 2004-09-20 05:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinker.livejournal.com
I was once in a situation where two of the OSO's were "neutral to kind of uncomfortable" with each other, and because there was strained communication between OSO-1 and pivot during the formation of the OSO-2/pivot relationship, things went really, really badly with OSO-1/pivot. (There were other complicating factors.)

At this point, I don't expect to get much input into the other partners of an outside partner, but I think it's nice. Also if the time taken for the new partner is coming from "partner time" rather than personal time, I think it's really only considerate to take some time to reassure those involved that this doesn't presage an eventual end.

Date: 2004-09-23 08:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinker.livejournal.com
I think it depends on what the history is, and other stuff. I'm really uncomfortable with "it's your relationship" on a primary level. If an outside partner takes another partner, yeah, that's what I expect -- "I'm seeing someone new..."

Profile

geekchick: (Default)
geekchick

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345 6 78
9101112131415
16 171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 27th, 2025 03:16 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios