geekchick: (anyone but bush)
[personal profile] geekchick
[I started writing this at 7:45, then Stuff Happened and I'm just getting around to posting it.]

I didn't get to go vote this evening; I'd intended to go on my way home from work, but then again with the Stuff Happened that needed to be dealt with, so I ended up not leaving the office until well after I would've been able to make it back to my polling location. Even at 6 PM I still hadn't quite made up my mind who I was going to vote for.

I know I have several friends who are die-hard Dean supporters, and I wanted to be able to get really excited about him...but frankly I don't think that even if he were likely to get the nomination that he'd have a chance in hell of beating Bush in November and we'd see another blowout. I gather Dean figured he had no shot at winning Virginia, given that Lyndon LaRouche had a more visible presence in the area. Kerry's here, Edwards was here, Dean is nowhere to be seen. One of Dean's supporters at the fundraising dinner in Richmond that he skipped apparently said something along the lines of "I really hope we don't come in fifth." That might've actually been a possibility for a while, as in the first round of results I heard Dean and Sharpton were tied for fourth. (Heh. The current headline on the local news web site: "The Rout Is On". Kerry's got a huge lead over Edwards, who in turn holds a huge lead over Clark, followed by Dean and then Sharpton.)

All things considered, I'd probably have gone the pragmatic route and voted for Kerry. He was about middle of the road in my list of preferred candidates, but I think that of those still standing, he's got the best shot at beating Shrub -- and really, that's foremost on my mind right now.

Date: 2004-02-11 06:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] quasigeostrophy.livejournal.com
Don't take this as personal criticism, just me kvetching about the state of the system, but I hate the concept of voting against someone or something. Wouldn't it be nice to actually have enough to vote for, for a change? *gets off soapbox* :-)

Re:

Date: 2004-02-11 06:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] quasigeostrophy.livejournal.com
*grin* I suppose that's the correct way to view it, given my previous comment. ;-)
(deleted comment)

Profile

geekchick: (Default)
geekchick

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345 6 78
9101112131415
16 171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 24th, 2026 07:47 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios