geekchick: (Default)
[personal profile] geekchick
Media Rights Technologies has apparently sent cease and desist letters to Apple, Microsoft, Adobe and Real Networks for "actively avoiding the use of MRT's technologies" (the X1 SeCure Recording Control) in Vista, Flash Player, Real Player, iTunes and the iPod. They claim that failure to use their technology is a violation of the DMCA.

Ooooookay. Well, that's certainly one way to get your product name out there; I surely hadn't heard of these guys and their product before today. Granted, I'm no marketing guru (and apparently neither is their marketing guy), but I think that there are probably far more effective ways to get your product licensed than "use our product or we'll sue you".

Date: 2007-05-11 08:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nminusone.livejournal.com
See icon...

Date: 2007-05-11 08:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abovenyquist.livejournal.com
The picture of the combined weight of Apple's and Microsoft's legal departments landing on them is amusing. "Splat!" wouldn't quite cut it...

Date: 2007-05-11 09:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] purplecthulhu.livejournal.com
The logical conclusion to this is that you have to use *every* DRM product.

The phrase 'laughed out of court' was invented for this kind of thing.

Date: 2007-05-11 09:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madbodger.livejournal.com
Sadly, it's been attempted before. By the DVD-CCA (with Macrovision), Qualcomm (with CDMA), and CBS (with Field Sequential Color, and again with Copyguard), that I know of. That last one's a fun tale of the good guys finally winning.

Date: 2007-05-11 11:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pecunium.livejournal.com
I saw this, and was amazed, amused and appalled.

It won't make it past prelim, the judge will refuse. There's no way the law can oblige a vendor to obtain a third party product.

If Adobe, Apple and Microsoft were making it impossible for those who wanted to use MRT's product, then there might be a case.

But as is... some lawyer/pr guys are earning their keeps.

TK

Date: 2007-05-12 02:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pecunium.livejournal.com
That's what I think it is too, but it's a stupid, and probably worse than futile attempt.

It's likely to get thrown out, and all the offended parties will claim costs, with a healthy bill.

If they are lucky the judge won't asses any sanctions for frivolity.

TK

Date: 2007-05-12 12:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tisiphone.livejournal.com
If I had to script a better reductio ad absurdum demonstration of the DMCA, I'm not sure I could.

Profile

geekchick: (Default)
geekchick

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345 6 78
9101112131415
16 171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 27th, 2025 04:55 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios