(no subject)
Jul. 6th, 2006 11:13 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Apparently, according to the Cox tech who came out yesterday, the reason our net connection wasn't working more than intermittently for the last week or so was because we were using 10.x.x.x addresses internally rather than 192.168.x.x and their side of things is only set up to recognize 192.168.x.x. o_O (For those who aren't also going "o_O" to that explanation: "Er, no. That's really not the problem." )
So.
Any of you fine folks out there have Verizon FiOS and opinions you'd like to share about your experience with it, particularly with tech support?
So.
Any of you fine folks out there have Verizon FiOS and opinions you'd like to share about your experience with it, particularly with tech support?
no subject
Date: 2006-07-06 03:18 pm (UTC)Vger has Verizon FIOS and is thrilled with it. I don't think he can actually speak to their tech support, though, since he's never actually had to use the tech support.
No it is sun spots!
Date: 2006-07-06 03:33 pm (UTC)Re: No it is sun spots!
Date: 2006-07-06 03:38 pm (UTC)Re: No it is sun spots!
Date: 2006-07-06 04:50 pm (UTC)Cu
no subject
Date: 2006-07-06 03:45 pm (UTC)We did eventually move on to "we don't have your new MAC address", although they certainly *did*, seeing as how the connection worked for several hours after the cable modem was replaced. Solar flares seems as likely an explanation as anything they've given us so far. ;)
I don't think he can actually speak to their tech support, though, since he's never actually had to use the tech support.
Well, that's promising. =)
Right now Verizon sort of claims we can get FiOS when I check for DSL availability, but then when I try to get specifics it says they're having system problems and can't look up availability. So, um, if you can't check availability, how can you give me the "I know you're looking for DSL, but you might like to know that we can offer you FiOS instead at that number" page? ;-P
no subject
Date: 2006-07-06 08:13 pm (UTC)...not that I'm still BITTER or anything, no.
(I'm quite happy with Speakeasy. Reliable service, clueful tech support, no piles of snail-mail-spam to ditch in the recycling bin every damn week...and really, the only time their marketroids did anything *remotely* annoying, they GROVELLED when I kvetched about it. Works for me, that does.)
no subject
Date: 2006-07-06 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-06 03:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-06 03:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-06 03:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-06 03:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-06 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-06 05:30 pm (UTC)Cox provides exactly the kind of service I expect from a monopoly. I'm not pleased, but I'm not surprised either.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-06 05:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-06 04:54 pm (UTC)My cousin just got the fios so I'll keep you posted, sort of want to know about it myself.
Wait actually there is something I remember the day after he got it he called me asking how he gets his systems on line. He had no connection...(and he has some tech back round). Need to call him and find out what was up.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-06 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-06 09:00 pm (UTC)http://thirdbase.livejournal.com/226075.html
no subject
Date: 2006-07-06 09:11 pm (UTC)Don't forget, for a few months last year I worked for a subcontractor that did technical support for their DSL. Run. Run very far, very fast. :-)
I tried my damnedest to provide the best service I could within my abilities. In so many ways, their policies were stonewalling, roadblocking, put-the-support-tech-in-a-bad-position procedures. Worst 5-1/2 months of my life, especially if you include the draconian policies of the subcontractor on top of the rest.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-06 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-07 12:37 pm (UTC)