![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Jun. 21st, 2012 01:23 pmKen over at Popehat gives us a review of Charles Carreon's complaint in his lawsuit against The Oatmeal, IndieGoGo, the NWF, and the American Cancer Society.
http://www.popehat.com/2012/06/19/the-oatmeal-v-funnyjunk-part-v-a-brief-review-of-charles-carreons-complaint/
I think the opening paragraphs will give you a pretty effective idea of his opinion:
Reading these posts and skimming the rest of the blog, I had developed a bit of a fangirl crush. And then I read this incredible cease and desist that he penned. *swoon* Stalking a former Assistant US Attorney is a bad idea, right?
http://www.popehat.com/2012/06/19/the-oatmeal-v-funnyjunk-part-v-a-brief-review-of-charles-carreons-complaint/
I think the opening paragraphs will give you a pretty effective idea of his opinion:
A few days ago I discussed a report — which proved true — that FunnyJunk's attorney Charles Carreon had sued Matthew Inman of The Oatmeal, IndieGoGo, and two charities in a fit of what can only be described as unbalanced, from-Hell's-heart-I-stab-at-thee pique.
Today, as promised, I'm going to talk a bit about the merits of — no, the substance of — you know, scratch that. I'm going to talk about the butthurt that Charles Carreon angrily crayoned down and chucked at a federal judge.
Reading these posts and skimming the rest of the blog, I had developed a bit of a fangirl crush. And then I read this incredible cease and desist that he penned. *swoon* Stalking a former Assistant US Attorney is a bad idea, right?