geekchick: (relationships)
geekchick ([personal profile] geekchick) wrote2004-09-20 03:54 pm

(no subject)

Here's a poly-related question that's come up more than once now, and I thought I'd check to see other people's thoughts on the matter.

Say your partner is getting involved with someone new. What level of contact and outreach do you expect from this new person up front?  Do you expect them to, for example, send you an email to say hello and to explain that they don't want to steal your partner from you? Do you expect them to make a concentrated effort to be actively friendly towards you and assume some sort of hostility if they don't, or do you assume things are fine unless there's some indication otherwise?  For that matter, do you even consider your partner's relationship with them to be any of your business?  (Assuming that your partner in question is not a spouse or primary-level partner.)   How do you handle it when one person in a relationship web has got wildly different ideas (in either direction) on how much contact is required for comfort than the other people involved? [Edit: I seem to have been unclear on this last bit, based on some of the answers. When I say "how much contact is required", in this context I mean in the initial getting involved stage; say Partner A really wants Potential Partner B to check in with them while B is initially getting involved with their common partner or else they'll assume Partner B is hostile, while it may not occur to Partner B that there's any reason to check in in the first place. All of this is in the context of making initial relationship-noises.]

Usually my take on it is that while outreach is not unwelcome, it's far from required.   If the only obvious thing that we have in common is that we share (or potentially share)  a partner, I don't necessarily feel like I need to try to force some sort of friendship there.  I assume things are neutral to okay unless I hear otherwise, and I honestly don't understand the mindset of assuming hostility from the outset.

[identity profile] quasigeostrophy.livejournal.com 2004-09-20 01:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Probably the latter. ;-)

I think it's one of those "YMMV" things - depends on the security/needs/wants/blah blah etc. etc. of the partners involved.

[identity profile] quasigeostrophy.livejournal.com 2004-09-20 01:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, thanks. You're trying to make me think on a Monday afternoon. ;-)

If Partner A expects a check-in and is a Primary and/or established partner, their needs would be priority over any Partner B's lack of same need. At least, in this case, it doesn't seem like there is a conflict of needs, just a presence and absence. Is Partner B resistant or finding it unacceptable? Then there is a problem, and I'd also want clear reasons from Partner B as to why it is a problem. If not, the check-in need of Partner A should be explained to them and would hopefully be acceptable, especially if reasons are given. (*hopes that all makes sense and I didn't miss something*)